Research
Open Access

Muscle dissatisfaction in young adult men

  • Anu Raevuori1Email author,
  • Anna Keski-Rahkonen1, 2, 3,
  • Cynthia M Bulik4,
  • Richard J Rose5,
  • Aila Rissanen2 and
  • Jaakko Kaprio1, 6
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health20062:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-2-6

©  Raevuori et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

Received: 13 December 2005

Accepted: 04 April 2006

Published: 04 April 2006

Abstract

Backround

Appearance concerns are of increasing importance in young men's lives. We investigated whether muscle dissatisfaction is associated with psychological symptoms, dietary supplement or anabolic steroid use, or physical activity in young men.

Methods

As a part of a questionnaire assessment of health-related behaviors in the population-based FinnTwin16 study, we assessed factors associated with muscle dissatisfaction in 1245 men aged 22–27 using logistic regression models.

Results

Of men, 30% experienced high muscle dissatisfaction, while 12% used supplements/steroids. Of highly muscle-dissatisfied men, 21.5% used supplements/steroids. Mean body mass index, waist circumference, or leisure aerobic activity index did not differ between individuals with high/low muscle dissatisfaction. Muscle dissatisfaction was significantly associated with a psychological and psychosomatic problems, alcohol and drug use, lower height satisfaction, sedentary lifestyle, poor subjective physical fitness, and lower life satisfaction.

Conclusion

Muscle dissatisfaction and supplement/steroid use are relatively common, and are associated with psychological distress and markers of sedentary lifestyle.

Background

Men are increasingly concerned about the way they look: a moderately or extremely muscular body is widely accepted as an ideal body shape for young men, creating discrepancy between the actual and desired body size and shape [1–5].

Young men who are dissatisfied with their body shape and musculature may be more likely to turn to bodybuilding, dietary supplements, and anabolic steroids to shape their bodies [6, 7]. The pursuit of muscularity has been associated with significant behavioural and psychological problems [4]. However, it is also plausible that exercise, weight training, and even competitive bodybuilding may actually improve men's body image [8–10].

Most of the existing studies in this area have focused on defined groups of young men, such as athletes and college students: it is unclear how generalizable their results are. Very little is known about the association of muscle dissatisfaction with physical activity, dietary supplement or anabolic steroid use, or psychological symptoms in young men from the general population. The aim of this study was to describe the psychological and behavioral correlates of muscle dissatisfaction in a population study of young Finnish males.

Methods

Sample

The data reported are from a population-based twin study, FinnTwin16, and comprised 1245 adult male twins from the 1977 to 1979 birth cohorts, for whom a questionnaire included items on muscle dissatisfaction (MD) and supplement and steroid use as described below. Data collection was approved by the Ethics committees of the University of Helsinki and Indiana University. The present study is based on the fourth wave of the study (response rate 83%) that assessed mental and physical health, weight control, dietary and exercise habits, social relationships, and alcohol and drug use. Mean age at response was 23.8 y (SD 23.7–23.9), mean BMI was 23.9 (SD 3.1), mean waist circumference 85.3 cm (SD 9.4) and mean height 179.4 cm (SD 6.6). A total of 70% of men studied were at normal body weight (BMI 20.0–24.9), while 26% were overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9) and 4% were obese (BMI 30.0–34.9). Of the study subjects 30% of men were 180–184 cm tall, 28% were 175–179 cm, 17% were 170–174 cm, 15% were 185–189 cm, and 6% were 190 cm or more while 4% were 169 cm or less. At the time of the study, 53% of men were not studying, while 21% attended a college or university, 18% attended a polytechnic, 4% attended high school, vocational school or vocational college and 4% studied in some other school not mentioned above. By this age, 5% of men had reached a higher academic degree while 8% had a degree from polytechnic and 42% from a vocational school.

Measures

Muscle dissatisfaction

Muscle dissatisfaction (MD) was assessed based on the following questionnaire item: "I would like to be more muscular". The six original responses were recategorized into "Always or Commonly" (High MD), "Often" (Intermediate MD), and "Sometimes, Rarely, or Never" (Low MD).

Supplement use

Supplement and/or steroid use (from here on, referred to as supplement use) was assessed based on a question: "Have you ever used hormone preparations, dietary supplements, or other special preparations in order to increase your muscle mass or to maximise the effects of gym training?". The answering alternatives were: "Yes, continuously during the last three months", "Yes, continuously at least three months sometimes earlier", "I have sometimes tried", and "I have never tried nor used". To differentiate established use, supplement use was dichotomized: men who had engaged in supplement use for ≥3 months either recently or previously were considered supplement users, while others were not considered as users.

Height satisfaction

Height satisfaction was assessed based on a following questionnaire item: "I am satisfied with my height". The answering alternatives were: "Always", "Commonly", "Often", "Sometimes", "Rarely", or "Never".

Anthropometrics

Values for height (cm), waist circumference (cm) and weight (kg) were based on self-reported data, from which body mass indices (BMI) were calculated. The correlations between self-reported and measured values were excellent, >0.9 for height and BMI, and 0.84 for waist circumference in a subsample of these data [11, 12].

Eating disorder inventory

The questionnaire included the original items of three subscales of the Eating Disorder Inventory-1 (EDI) [13, 14]: Body dissatisfaction (BD, 9 items), Drive for thinness (DT, 7 items), and Bulimia (B, 7 items). A Finnish version of this instrument has been translated and validated (Charpentier, in preparation). Scoring for EDI used a range of 1–6 for responses in the questionnaire. DT and B were reasonably normally distributed and were used as continuous variables. However, the distribution of BD was highly skewed, and therefore categorized based on tertiles of the distribution.

Physical activity and fitness

The participants were asked to characterize their subjective physical fitness using the alternatives: "very good", "fairly good", "satisfactory", "fairly poor" and "very poor". For the analyses, the variable was recategorized into three classes: "Fairly/very good", "satisfactory", "fairly/very poor".

Leisure aerobic activity index (Metabolic Equivalent, MET h × d -1, work metabolic rate divided by resting metabolic rate) was calculated from the product of self reported intensity × duration × days/year frequency. We used MET-values 4 (light aerobic activity, walking), 6 (moderate aerobic activity, brisk walking), 10 (intense aerobic activity, jogging), 13 (very intense activity, running).

We also asked for daily time spent on sedentary leisure interests, for example driving, TV viewing, computer game and Internet use.

Illicit drug use

Drug use was assessed based on answers to a question "Have you ever used hash, marijuana or other drugs, or have you for example sniffed glue?". The response alternatives were: "Never", "1–3 times", "4–9 times", "10–19 times", "Over 20 times". For the analyses, the variable was recategorized into three classes: "Never used", "Experimental or mild drug use (1–19 trials)", and "Established drug use (over 20 trials)".

Other psychological measures

The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a screening instrument designed to detect psychiatric disorders in community settings and non-psychiatric clinical settings [15]. It has been validated for the Finnish population [16, 17]. Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (RAPI) is a 23-item, unidimensional self-administered screening tool for assessing adolescent problem drinking [18]. Psychosomatic symptom frequencies were assessed based on answers to six items: stomach aches, tension and nervousness, difficulties in falling asleep or nightly awakenings, headache, lower back pain, and pain in the neck and shoulder area [19]. Each item contained four response alternatives which were: "Rarely or never", "About once a month", "About once a week, and "Almost every day".

The questionnaire also included the Life Satisfaction Scale, which covers four items: interest in life, happiness, general ease of living, and loneliness [20]. The scale correlates highly with the Beck depression inventory (r > 0.6) [21].

Sociodemographic factors

We assessed place of residence (rural vs. urban) using five response categories based on population density. Rural areas were considered to include both rural villages and countryside.

Because the men studied were relatively young and many were still studying, we assessed current educational level in addition to highest educational attainment. The question asked was: "Do you attend a school or college at the moment?" The response alternatives were "I do not attend a school at the moment", "I attend a high school, vocational school or in vocational college", "I attend a polytechnic", "I attend a college or university" and "Other". About educational attainment we asked: "Which schools/degrees have you completed?", using similar response categories as in the previous question.

Analysis

We investigated associations between independent and dependent variables using cross-tabulations, Pearson's chi-squared test of independence and logistic regression. For continuous variables, odds ratios were calculated for both a unit increase in the dependent variable, and by using a median split to form a dichotomized variable. All analyses were controlled for clustered sampling [22] within the twin pair using Stata (Version 8.0) [23].

Results

Characteristics of study sample by muscle dissatisfaction status

Of all respondents, 29.9% experienced high MD, 14.3% intermediate MD, and 55.8% low MD (see Table 1). The subjects of our study were relatively similar in age, height, BMI and waist circumference irrespective of their MD and supplement use status (Table 1). BMI and waist were correlated at r = 0.79 among low MD subjects, r = 0.80 among intermediate MD subjects and r = 0.75 among high MD subjects.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study sample by muscle dissatisfaction (MD) status. Means and 95% CI are given for continuous traits

 

High MD

Intermediate MD

Low MD

n(% of population)

372 (29.9%)

178 (14.3%)

695 (55.8%)

SU, n (Proportion of MD subgroup subjects)

80 (21.5%)

20 (11.2%)

50 (7.2%)

Mean age, years

23.8 (23.8–23.9)

23.9 (23.8–23.9)

23.8 (23.8–23.9)

Mean BMI, kg/m2

23.5 (23.2–23.8)

23.7. (23.2–24.2)

23.9 (23.6–24.1)

Waist circumference, cm

84.1 (83.2–85.1)

85.0 (83.4–86.5)

84.5 (83.7–85.2)

Mean height, cm

180.0 (179.2–180.7)

180.4 (179.3–181.5)

179.0 (178.4–179.5)

Note: No statistically differences between high, intermediate and low muscle disatisfied participants for any traits

Height satisfaction

Of respondents, 52.5% reported being always satisfied with their height as 28.5% reported this commonly and 8.4% often. A total of 4.7% of men were height satisfied only sometimes, 3.5% rarely and 2.4% never.

Height satisfaction decreased significantly from low to high MD even when adjusted with actual height (OR for always versus commonly 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–2.1, OR for always versus often 1.9, 95% CI 1.4–2.7, OR for always versus sometimes 2.9, 95% CI 1.8–4.8, OR for always versus rarely 3.9, 95% CI 2.3–6.9 and OR for always versus never height satisfied 3.2, 95% CI 1.4–7.6). Those whose actual height was 174 cm or less were significantly more often height dissatisfied (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.9–5.2), but no more dissatisfied with their musculature (x2 = 1.78, p = 0.41) than their taller peers.

Sociodemographic correlates of muscle dissatisfaction

The place of residence was not associated with MD, but living in a rural area (rural village or countryside) was associated with less supplement use (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.8). Current school attendance or a level of educational attainment at this age were not significantly associated with MD.

Psychological correlates of muscle dissatisfaction

The basic psychometric characteristics of MD subgroup subjects are given in Table 2. The correlates of MD in the univariate models are presented in Table 5. Among young men from the general population, psychological distress as measured by GHQ, psychosomatic symptoms, life satisfaction, drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction were statistically significantly associated with muscle dissatisfaction. These findings were independent of the place of residence and current educational status. Body Dissatisfaction had the strongest association with MD of the three EDI subscales. Eating Disorder Inventory's Drive for thinness and Bulimia were also significantly associated with MD. All three EDI subscales remained significantly associated with MD, even when controlling in regression models for measures of depressive symptoms, i.e. GHQ or life satisfaction.
Table 2

Basic psychological characteristics of high/intermediate/low muscle dissatisfied (MD) men: mean scores and SDs.

 

high MD

Intermediate MD

Low MD

n

372

178

695

Body dissatisfaction1

22.2 (6.4)

21.1 (6.4)

18.6 (5.4)

Drive for thinness1

17.4 (4.5)

16.9 (4.3)

16.2 (4.1)

Bulimia1

10.2 (2.6)

10.0 (3.0)

9.5 (2.5)

RAPI2

30.9 (9.8)

29.0 (8.5)

28.2 (8.1)

Life satisfaction3

9.2 (3.2)

9.1 (3.0)

8.1 (2.8)

Psychosomatic symptom score

10.2 (3.1)

9.9 (2.9)

9.2 (2.8)

General Health Questionnaire4

2.0 (2.9)

1.7 (2.5)

1.0 (1.9)

1 Eating Disorder Inventory[13]

2 Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index[18]

3 higher score → lower life satisfaction

4 higher score → poorer mental health

Physical activity and fitness

Higher leisure aerobic activity was not statistically significantly associated with MD (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.99–1.04) even though the leisure aerobic activity increased categorically with muscle dissatisfaction (Table 4). Instead, MD was associated with longer daily duration (>2 hours/day) of sedentary leisure interests like reading, Internet and TV viewing (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.12–3.33). MD was also associated with poorer subjective physical fitness, the OR for satisfactory versus good/very good physical fitness being 1.1 (95% CI 0.8–1.3), and the OR for poor/very poor versus good/very good physical fitness being 2.5 (95% CI 1.7–3.9).
Table 3

Drug use and supplement use of high/intermediate/low muscle dissatisfied (MD) men based on categoric measures.

 

High MD

Intermediate MD

Low MD

Drug use (n, % of MD subgroup)

   

   Never

258 (69.4%)

122 (68.5%)

524 (75.4%)

   Experimental or mild use1

82 (22.0%)

46 (25.8%)

130 (18.7%)

   Established use2

32 (8.6%)

9 (5.1%)

40 (5.8%)

Supplement Use (n, % of MD subgroup)

   

   SU

80 (21.5%)

20 (11.2%)

50 (7.2%)

   Non-SU

292 (78.5%)

158 (88.8%)

645 (92.8%)

1 1–19 trials

2 20 or more trials

Table 4

Self-reported leisure aerobic activity and subjective physical fitness of high/intermediate/low muscle dissatisfied men

 

High MD

Intermediate MD

Low MD

Leisure aerobic activity (MET) mean value (95% CI)

5.3 (4.7–5.9)

5.2 (4.4–5.9)

4.9 (4.5–5.3)

Subjective physical fitness n (% of MD subgroup)

   

   Fairly/very good

234 (62.9%)

109 (61.2%)

474 (68.2%)

   Satisfactory

96 (25.8%)

52 (29.2%)

189 (27.2%)

   Fairly/very bad

38 (10.2%)

14 (7.9%)

26 (3.7%)

Table 5

Psychological correlates of muscle dissatisfaction from univariate models. Odds ratios were calculated both per unit increase and on median split (high vs. low) increase.

 

OR (per unit)

95% CI

OR, high vs low

95% CI

p-value

General psychological measures

     

GHQ1

1.18

1.12–1.23

-

-

<0.0001

Psychosomatic symptom score1

1.11

1.07–1.16

2.65

1.89–3.72

<0.0001

Life satisfaction score1

1.12

1.08–1.17

2.55

1.90–3.44

<0.0001

Substance use and abuse

     

RAPI1,2

1.03

1.02–1.04

2.26

1.59–3.22

<0.0001

Drug use

     

   Never

1.0 (reference)

    

   Experimental or mild (1–19 trials)

1.28

0.99–1.66

-

-

0.06

   Established use (≥20 trials)

1.51

0.95–2.39

  

0.08

Eating disorder inventory

     

Drive for thinness1

1.06

1.03–1.09

2.60

1.70–3.95

<0.0001

Bulimia1

1.09

1.04–1.13

2.09

1.41–3.08

0.0002

Body dissatisfaction

     

1st tertile

1.0 (reference)

    

2nd tertile

1.99

1.46–2.68

-

-

<0.0001

3rd tertile

3.89

2.94–5.16

  

<0.0001

1 Dichotomy based on median split

2 Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index[18]

Substance and alcohol abuse and supplement use

Association with MD and alcohol use measured by RAPI was highly significant (Table 5) (p < 0.0001). Association with MD and drug use was marginally significant, with the OR for never used nor tried versus experimental or mild use being 1.3 (95% CI 0.99–1.66) and OR for never used nor tried versus established use being 1.5 (95% CI 0.95–2.39), see Table 5.

The proportion of supplement users was 12.0% of all respondents: supplement use increased monotonically with muscle dissatisfaction (Table 3). Of non-supplement users, 26.7% experienced high MD compared to 53.0% of supplement users (x2 = 47.0, p < 0.001).

Multivariable analyses of muscle dissatisfaction

In a multivariable model where the same variables as in the univariate model excluding the EDI subscale of Body Dissatisfaction were entered, GHQ score (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.16), life satisfaction score (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.15–2.39), and EDI Drive for thinness (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.21–3.47) remained statistically significantly associated with MD (Table 6). Psychosomatic symptom score remained marginally significantly associated with MD in a multivariate model (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.99–2.21).
Table 6

Correlates of muscle dissatisfaction from multivariate models. Variables significantly associated with muscle dissatisfaction in univariate models excluding Eating Disorder Inventory's subscale Body Dissatisfaction were entered in the multivariable model. Variables presented in this table were adjusted for all other variables in the model.

 

OR

95% CI

p value

General psychological measures GHQ score

1.09

1.02–1.16

0.006

Psychosomatic symptom score1

1.48

0.99–2.21

0.06

Life Satisfaction Score1

1.65

1.15–1.2.39

0.007

Substance use and abuse

   

RAPI1,2

1.33

0.86–2.08

0.20

Drug use

   

   Never

1.0 (reference)

-

-

   Experimental or mild use (1–19 trials)

1.01

0.77–1.33

0.93

   Established use (≥20 trials)

0.98

0.57–1.69

0.94

Eating disorder inventory

   

EDI subscales

   

   Drive for thinness1

2.05

1.21–3.47

0.007

   Bulimia1

1.03

0.65–1.64

0.89

1 These explanatory variables in the multivariable model were dichotomised using a median split.

2 Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index[18]

Discussion

Muscle dissatisfaction was strongly associated with psychological distress such as depression and anxiety symptoms, as was hypothesized based on previous studies on body dissatisfaction and related disorders among both men and women [2, 4, 24]. In our study, lower general life satisfaction, psychosomatic symptoms, lower subjective physical fitness, sedentary lifestyles, lower height satisfaction and problems with alcohol and illicit drug use were also associated with muscle dissatisfaction. In addition, the correlation between muscle dissatisfaction and supplement use was strong. Compared to others, muscle dissatisfied men scored higher on all three EDI subscales referring to potential eating problems and dissatisfaction with one's body shape and weight.

In our current Western culture, appearance concerns are ubiquitous, particularly among young people [25, 26]. It is generally accepted that popular culture, advertisement and even toys do not only reflect, but also foster appearance concerns. Very little is known about how these concerns manifest in young men. Our study demonstrates that male appearance concerns are potential indicators of other health problems, such as depressive and anxiety symptoms, and substance use and sedentary lifestyles.

In this population based study we wanted to focus on muscle dissatisfaction since the current young males' body ideal is perhaps primarily based on muscularity. Nevertheless, we do not wish to belittle other aspects of males' body dissatisfaction such as weight and body shape concerns and welcome more sophisticated study designs in the future. In our sample, those more dissatisfied with their musculature were also more dissatisfied with their height even though actual height did not differ between the groups and was adjusted in the regression model. This further signals how high dissatisfaction with one's body easily has more than a single dimension and thus perhaps merely reflects the overall discontent with the self. We also analysed whether relative shortness (height 174 cm or less; 21% of the sample) would be associated with muscle dissatisfaction, but that was not the case.

Muscle dissatisfaction does not appear to be more common among young men who exercise frequently than those who exercise little. There is previous evidence that even demanding training and fitness regimes are not associated with poor body image [8, 27]. Rather, muscle dissatisfaction seems to be common in men who are also dissatisfied with many other aspects of their lives, and also tend to rate their subjective physical fitness less favorably than other men. There is evidence that regular exercise is associated with positive psychological health [28, 29] and body satisfaction especially in males [30]. Although our study is not able to establish causality, future studies should address whether exercise interventions may also have positive effects on muscle dissatisfaction.

This study explored correlates of muscle dissatisfaction among men in the largest population sample yet reported. The strengths of our sample include its relatively large size, good population coverage, and high response rate. The battery we used was fairly extensive, and included many standardised and validated questionnaires.

Limitations of this study include self-reporting bias: however, an inherent bias in studies of this type. We also measured muscle dissatisfaction using only a single item. Although this item has not undergone extensive psychometric validation, the psychological associations of muscle dissatisfaction were robust and not sensitive to choice of cut-off points. Muscle dissatisfaction was highly correlated with the Body for Dissatisfaction subscale of the EDI, and is probably more appropriate for the measurement of body dissatisfaction in young men, because the EDI mainly focuses on female-specific areas of appearance concerns. Conceptually, muscle dissatisfaction can be regarded to be part of body dissatisfaction, which was therefore not entered into multivariate model like other variables significantly associated with the muscle dissatisfaction in the univariate model. We regret that for practical reasons, the inclusion of longer and more comprehensive measurement of male-specific appearance concerns, like the Muscle Appearance Satisfaction Scale [31], Swansea Muscularity Attitudes Questionnaire [32] or the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD-YBOCS) [33] was not an option in this large population study: we highly recommend assessing their use in future studies.

Further limitations of our study include that we had little information about our participants' body composition. By itself, BMI cannot separate lean and total fat body mass, but including waist circumference to these measures was an attempt to compensate for this limitation. Also, the question concerning supplement use did not separate the illegal use of anabolic steroids, other hormones and medicine-like substances from more widely used and legal substances like amino acids or creatinine. However, there is some evidence that creatinine and other nutritional supplements marketed as muscle mass enhancers in Finland have contained small amounts of anabolic steroids [34]. The same phenomenon has been noted internationally [35]. Thus supplement users would not always be aware of the true nature and actual content of the muscle enhancers of their choice.

Finally, we used a large twin sample to address muscle dissatisfaction in the general population. Although twins are in many respects similar to singletons [36] in particular for most psychiatric disorders [37, 38], some previous studies suggest that adolescent twins may also be more physically active and physically fit than non-twins [39, 40]. It is not known whether these small differences persist into adulthood. Further, twins may differ from non-twins in body size, which in childhood and adolescence is on average slightly smaller compared to singletons. Pietiläinen et al. [41] compared mean body height and mean body weight in the twin cohort used in this study (FT16) when the participants were aged 16–17 y to that of Finnish singletons at the same age and found that by the age of 17 y, the twin boys had reached the height of singleton boys, but still had lower BMIs than the 16.5 y singletons. Our sample suggests that this difference also disappears by young adulthood [14].

Conclusion

In summary, in young men, muscle dissatisfaction is a broad indicator of poor psychological well-being. It is associated with psychological symptoms and substance use. It was also associated with poor self-rated physical fitness and sedentary lifestyles. Future studies should assess prospectively factors that can improve young men's body image and muscle satisfaction and thus mitigate their psychological suffering.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by NIH grants AA12502 and AA08315, the Academy of Finland (44069, 201461, and Centre of Excellence in Complex Disease Genetics grant), and the European Union Fifth Framework Program (QLRT-1999-00916 and QLG2-CT-2002-01254). ARa also received funding for four months from the state of Endowment for the Helsinki University Central Hospital and a small supplementary grant from the pharmaceutical company Lundbeck. The authors are grateful to Kauko Heikkilä, Phil. Lic., for technical assistance and database management.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki
(2)
Obesity Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Helsinki University Central Hospital
(3)
Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University
(4)
Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(5)
Department of Psychology, Indiana University
(6)
Department of Mental Health, National Public Health Institute

References

  1. Epel ES, Spanakos A, Kasl-Godley J, Brownell KD: Body shape ideals across gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, race, and age in personal advertisements. Int J Eat Disord. 1996, 19: 265-273. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199604)19:3<265::AID-EAT5>3.0.CO;2-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pope HG, Gruber AJ, Mangweth B, Bureau B, de Col, Jouvent R, Hudson JI: Body image Perception among men in three countries. Am J Psychiatry. 2000, 157: 1297-1301. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bulik CM, Wade TD, Heath AC, Martin NG, Stunkard AJ, Eaves LJ: Relating body mass index to figural stimuli: population-based normative data for Caucasians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001, 25: 1517-1524. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801742.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McCabe MP, Ricciardelli LA: Body image dissatisfaction among males across the lifespan: a review of past literature. J Psychosom Res. 2004, 56: 675-685. 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00129-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohane GH, Harrison PG: Body image in boys: A review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord. 2001, 29: 373-379. 10.1002/eat.1033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brower KJ, Blow FC, Hill EM: Risk factors for anabolic-androgenic steroid use in men. J Psychiatr Res. 1994, 28: 369-380. 10.1016/0022-3956(94)90019-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Field AE, Austin SB, Camargo CA, Taylor CB, Striegel-Moore RH, Loud KJ, Colditz GA: Exposure to the mass media, body shape concerns, and use of supplements to improve weight and shape among male and female adolescents. Pediatrics. 2005, 116: e214-220. 10.1542/peds.2004-2022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pickett TC, Lewis RJ, Cash TF: Men, muscles, and body image: comparisons of competitive bodybuilders, weight trainers, and athletically active controls. Br J Sports Med. 2005, 39: 217-222. 10.1136/bjsm.2004.012013.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hausenblas HA, Fallon EA: Relationship among Body Image, exercise behavior, and exercise dependence symptoms. Int J Eat Disord. 2002, 32: 179-185. 10.1002/eat.10071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Boroughs M, Thompson K: Exercise status and sexual orientation as moderators of body image disturbance and eating disorders in males. Int J Eat Disord. 2002, 31: 307-311. 10.1002/eat.10031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Silventoinen K, Sammalisto S, Perola M, Boomsma DI, Cornes BK, Davis C, Dunkel L, deLange M, Harris JR, Hjelmborg JVB, Luciano M, Martin NG, Mortensen J, Nistico L, Pedersen NL, Skytthe A, Spector TD, Stazi MA, Willemsen G, Kaprio J: Heritability of Adult Body Height: A Comparative Study of Twin Cohorts in Eight Countries. Twin Res. 2003, 6: 399-408. 10.1375/136905203770326402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schousboe K, Willemsen G, Kyvik KO, Mortensen J, Boomsma DI, Cornes BK, Davis CJ, Fagnani C, Hjelmborg J, Kaprio J, deLange M, Luciano M, Martin NG, Pedersen N, Pietiläinen KH, Rissanen A, Saarni S, Sorensen TIA, van Baal GCM, Harris JR: Sex Differencies in Heritability of BMI: A Comparative Study of Results from Twin Studies in Eight Countries. Twin Res. 2003, 6: 409-421. 10.1375/136905203770326411.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Garner DM: Eating disorder inventory 2. 1991, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, , professional manualGoogle Scholar
  14. Keski-Rahkonen A, Bulik CM, Neale B, Rissanen A, Kaprio J, Rose RJ: Body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness in Finnish young adult twins. Int J Eat Disord. 2005, 37: 188-199. 10.1002/eat.20138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF: A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1979, 9: 139-145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Holi MM, Marttunen M, Aalberg V: Comparison of the GHQ-36, the GHQ-12 and the SCL-90 as psychiatric screening instruments in the Finnish population. Nord J Psychiatry. 2003, 57: 233-238. 10.1080/08039480310001418.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Penninkilampi-Kerola V, Miettunen J, Ebeling HA: Comparative assessment of the factor structures and psychometric properties of the GHQ-12 and the GHQ-20 based on the data from a Finnish population-based sample. Scand J Psychol.Google Scholar
  18. White HR, Labouvie EW: Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 1989, 50: 30-37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Aro H: Life stress and psychosomatic symptoms among 14 to 16-year old Finnish adolescents. Psychol Med. 1987, 17: 191-201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Koivumaa-Honkanen H, Honkanen R, Viinamaki H, Heikkila K, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M: Life Satisfaction and suicide: a 20-year follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry. 2001, 158: 433-439. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Koivumaa-Honkanen H, Kaprio J, Honkanen R, Viinamäki H, Koskenvuo M: Life Satisfaction and depression in a 15-year follow-up of healthy adults. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004, 39: 994-999. 10.1007/s00127-004-0833-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams RL: A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000, 56: 645-646. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00645.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stata, Version 8.0, College Station, TX. [http://www.stata.com]
  24. Bohne A, Keuthen NJ, Wilhelm S, Deckersbach T, Jenike MA: Prevalence of symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder and its correlates: a cross-cultural comparison. Psychosomatics. 2002, 43: 486-490. 10.1176/appi.psy.43.6.486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mikkilä V, Lahti-Koski M, Pietinen P, Virtanen SM, Rimpelä M: Associates of obesity and weight dissatisfaction among Finnish adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2003, 6: 49-56. 10.1079/PHN2002352.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Bulik CM, Kendler KS, Roysamb E, Tambs K, Torgersen S, Harris JR: Undue influence of weight on self-evaluation: a population-based twin study of gender differences. Int J Eat Disord. 2004, 35: 123-132. 10.1002/eat.10252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindwall M, Hassmen P: The role of exercise and gender for physical self-perceptions and importance ratings in Swedish university students. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004, 14: 373-380. 10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.372.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rohrer JE, Pierce JR, Blackburn C: Lifestyle and mental health. Prev Med. 2005, 40: 438-443. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.07.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Scully D, Kremer J, Meade MM, Graham R, Dudgeon K: Physical exercise and psychological wellbeing: a critical review. Br J Sports Med. 1998, 32: 111-120.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Thome J, Espelage D: Relations among exercise, coping, disordered eating, and psychological health among college students. Eat Behav. 2004, 5: 337-351. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.04.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mayville SB, Williamson DA, White MA, Netemeyer RG, Drab DL: Development of the Muscle Appearance Satisfaction Scale: a self-report measure for the assessment of muscle dysmorphia symptoms. Assessment. 2002, 9: 351-360. 10.1177/1073191102238156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Edward S, Launder C: Investigating Muscularity Concerns in Male Body Image: Development of the Swansea Muscularity Attitudes Questionnaire. Int J Eat Disord. 2000, 28: 120-124. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(200007)28:1<120::AID-EAT15>3.0.CO;2-H.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips KA, Hollander E, Rasmussen SA, Aronowitz BR, DeCaria C, Goodman WK: A severity rating scale for body dysmorphic disorder: development, reliability, and validity of a modified version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997, 33: 17-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sinisalo N: Urheiluvalmisteiden epäpuhtaudet ja pakkausmerkintöjen lainmukaisuus [In Finnish: Sport supplements: impurities and regulatory compliance of package markings]. Master's thesis. 2004, University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  35. Geyer H, Parr MK, Mareck U, Reinhart U, Schrader Y, Schänzer W: Analysis of non-hormonal nutritional supplements for anabolic-androgenic steroids – Results of an international study. Int J Sports Med. 2004, 25: 124-129. 10.1055/s-2004-819955.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Andrew T, Hart DJ, Snieder H, de Lange M, Spector TD, MacGregor AJ: Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women. Twin Res. 2004, 4: 464-477. 10.1375/1369052012803.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Hettema JM, Neale MC, Kendler KS: A review and meta-analysis of the genetic epidemiology of anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2001, 158: 1568-1578. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1568.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kendler KS, Walters EE, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ: The structure of the genetic and environmental risk factors for six major psychiatric disorders in women. Phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, bulimia, major depression, and alcoholism. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995, 52: 374-383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Aarnio M, Kujala UM, Kaprio J: Associations of health-related behaviours, school type and health status to physical activity patterns in 16 year old boys and girls. Scand J Soc Med. 1997, 3: 156-167.Google Scholar
  40. Moilanen I, Rantakallio P: Living habits and personality development of adolescent twins: a longitudinal follow-up study in a birth cohort from pregnancy to adolescence. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1990, 39: 215-220.Google Scholar
  41. Pietiläinen KH, Kaprio J, Rissanen A, Winter T, Rimpela A, Viken RJ, Rose RJ: Distribution and heritability of BMI in Finnish adolescents aged 16 y and 17 y: a study of 4884 twins and 2509 singletons. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999, 23: 107-115. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800767.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Raevuori et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement