Open Access

Depression in cancer patients: a critical review

Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health20073:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-2

Received: 31 October 2006

Accepted: 08 February 2007

Published: 08 February 2007

Abstract

Cancer patients experience several stressors and emotional upheavals. Fear of death, interruption of life plans, changes in body image and self-esteem, changes in social role and lifestyle are all important issues to be faced. Moreover, Depressive Disorders may impact the course of the disease and compliance. The cost and prevalence, the impairment caused, and the diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty surrounding depressive symptoms among cancer patients make these conditions a priority for research. In this article we discuss recent data, focusing on detection of Depressive Disorders, biological correlates, treatments and unmet needs of depressed cancer patients.

1. Background

Cancer accounts for nearly 25% of deaths in the United States, exceeded only by heart disease [1]. Major Depressive Disorder accounts for 4.4 percent of the overall global disease burden, a contribution similar to ischemic heart disease or diarrhoeal disease [2], and the Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) for depression in the near future will be greater than cancer or HIV related disease [3]. A strong body of evidence demonstrates the coexistence of depression and cancer, reported prevalence rates of depression for solid tumours ranging from 20 to 50%. These results generally include all the depressive disorders not just the Major Depressive Disorder. Grassi and Rosti found that out of 201 recently diagnosed cancer patients, 15% met the criteria for a Major Depressive Disorder [4]. Sharpe estimated at 8% the prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder in a large sample of cancer patients, although most of them had an inactive disease [5]. In a sample of haematological inpatients prevalence of Major Depression was 9% [6], the same reported by Coyne et al among breast cancer patients [7]. In the screening program conducted by Ell and colleagues among low-income women with cancer the prevalence rate for Major Depression was 24% [8]. There is reason to believe that many patients affected by subclinical depression go undetected. These estimates are made around time of cancer diagnosis. More research is needed to establish the prevalence of depressive disorders in the years after the diagnosis using standardized diagnostic criteria. The prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder at time of the first breast cancer recurrence was estimated at 22% by Okamura [9]. In a recent observational cohort study, conducted among 222 women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer, prevalence of depression and anxiety was 33% at diagnosis, 15% after one year, and 45% after diagnosis of recurrence [10].

The reported variability in prevalence is attributable to several factors: medical, personal and factors related to different study methods, instruments and procedures. Not all cancer patients are the same: cancer site, age, disease stage, time from diagnosis, cancer treatment, are among the most important variables associated with prevalence of depression among cancer patients and these should be taken into account. Psychiatric morbidity and other psychological aspects among breast cancer patients are very well studied, while fewer reports regard cancer of other sites. [6, 1113]. Personal variables such as cultural and ethnical characteristics, religious attitudes, social economic status, personality traits, coping styles, social support, distance from hospital are also very important. Not all trials have taken into account the different stages of the cancer process. The importance of these variables has been recently confirmed by results obtained from an observational study, conducted on 2.600 women treated for early breast cancer, showing that depressive symptoms were not associated with objective cancer-related factors [14]. In the absence of sufficient formal trial data in cancer patients, clinical decision should be influenced by experience in the general population, and naturalistic studies appearing in cancer literature [15].

Over the last years many efforts have been made in order to improve screening procedures, but at present no standardized approach exists for the diagnosis of depression among cancer patients. An additional source of variation is represented by the between observer variability; but, perhaps, in practice, what really matters and makes the difference is the professional background, with particular reference to knowledge in psychopathology and clinical experience. Inadequate diagnosis of Major Depression among cancer patients causes reduction in quality of life, prolonged hospitalization and higher rates of non compliance with treatment plan [16]. In addition social support has been identified as an important factor alleviating depression in cancer patients, consequently, family counselling should be usefully employed to educate the family on depression that accompanies cancer [17].

2. Assessment of depression among cancer patients

In the field of psycho-oncology the widely used instruments BSI (Brief Symptoms Inventory) [18] and the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) [19] are employed for detecting psychological distress. Such scales were specifically developed to identify symptoms in non psychiatric medical outpatients. These instruments contributed to the recognition of psychological suffering in different settings, and improved psycho-oncology. Nevertheless too often prevalence of psychiatric disorders is reported only on the basis of studies using HADS and BSI. In many studies the CES-D (Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression) [20] or the BDI (Beck Depression Inventory) [21], showing acceptable sensitivities and specificities in samples of cancer patients, were employed.

On the other hand, patients with symptoms of depression may not fulfil the DSM-IV criteria for Depressive Disorders [22]. This is a crucial point. As an example, the reported high rate of Adjustment Disorders is due in part to the special status of being a cancer patient, and in part to the inadequacy of DSM-IV criteria for such patients, a sort of makeshift solution.

Moreover the prevalence of depression among cancer patients is often underestimated, because many symptoms of depression, such as fatigue, weight loss, loss of appetite or sleep disruption, closely mirror the physiologic effects of cancer; or the use of certain treatments and other symptom management medication may preclude an appropriate diagnosis. [18]. As suggested by some authors [23] it is necessary to adopt an adequate approach for discriminating the somatic symptoms of cancer and those due to treatment from the criteria of DSM-IV for major depression. Three models were proposed: the inclusive ones, which suggest that somatic symptoms are counted regardless of the cause; the substituted ones, which suggest that non somatic symptoms are substituted for somatic symptoms; the exclusive ones, which suggest that somatic symptoms may be disregarded as diagnostic criteria [17]. As an example of the exclusive approach, it has been proposed to remove fatigue from the DSM-IV criteria. In our opinion the modified DSM-IV approach to diagnose Major Depression proposed at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, that eliminates anorexia and fatigue from the list of the nine criteria and requires only four of the remaining seven symptoms for diagnosis, could increase the specificity of the diagnosis [6]. Nevertheless there are still no data confirming the validity of these models.

It is to note that, as Bailey suggested [17], culture may influence symptom expression, as an example individuals of the Asian culture suffering from depression tend to present somatic symptoms of depression neglecting the psychological symptoms.

Nevertheless the issue of Adjustment Disorder remains unresolved. This issue needs more attention, because there are still many clinicians that erroneously consider Adjustment Disorder always as a normal transition. The real problem is that cancer related stressors persist for long time, so that diagnosis should be modified and, treatments are delivered with further delay.

Recently several multiphasic screening studies to detect depression have shown an increase in sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis [5, 24, 25].

Another issue in detecting depressive disorders among cancer patients is the methodology of the interview. While administering rating scales in a waiting room or interviewing patients over the telephone offer practical advantages such as simplicity, low cost, and applicability to large samples, there is no doubt that a comprehensive psychiatric assessment is warranted to diagnose a Major Depressive Disorder, and this is difficult without seeing the patient. Moreover, patients need time and space. Most important data are often obtained in the last minutes of an hour visit in a dedicated room. And this has to do with relationship, not with methodology.

3. Features of depression

To better understand the complex nature of depression in cancer patients, it is useful to consider several aspects. A fundamental issue is that depressive disorders are syndromes not diseases, and include a variety of mood disturbances and clinical presentations. Negative mood along with low energy, poor concentration, loss of interests, memory disturbances, low self-esteem, guilt feelings, hypochondriac preoccupation, sleep and appetite disturbances and hopelessness are the most common symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder. Features underrepresented in endogenous depression, such as psychic and somatic anxiety, somatic complaints are more common in atypical depression. However, a wide variety of clinical pictures can actually be observed in depressed patients. As an example, current psychiatric classification systems tend to underestimate the role played in depressed patients by symptoms such as anger, irritability, and hostility [26, 27].

As an alternative model in the assessment of depressive disorders many authors promoted a clinimetric approach rather than the psychometric model; this because in clinical practice, psychiatrists may weigh factors such as the progression of disease, the overall severity of the disorder, the patients' social support and their adaptation and resilience and reaction to stressful life circumstances [28, 29]. Physicians may find this model useful and practical in the assessment of depressive symptoms among cancer patients. Coping strategies, feelings of loss, cognitive adaptation and transition are all fundamental psychological aspects that affect different clinical manifestations of every single cancer patient [30]. These components vary tremendously whether you are assessing a female with breast cancer diagnosed and treated ten years ago, or if you are dealing with a female with colon cancer, recently stomized.

Another question has to do with fatigue, the most frequently reported side effect of cancer treatment, with a prevalence ranging from 25% to 99%[31]. However, fatigue is also a feeling state not related to cancer treatments. Even though fatigue may be associated with depression in patients treated with chemotherapy, too often is taken for depression [32, 33]. Moreover, in a randomized double/blind trial Morrow demonstrates that paroxetine affects depressive symptoms but not fatigue [34]. In fact, fatigue due to chemotherapy does not include an emotional component while fatigue related to a depressive syndrome does, obviously an individual in chemotherapy experiencing fatigue can develop feelings of demoralization. Bower found that in breast cancer patients not in chemotherapy, fatigue was associated with flatter cortisol slope, what may reflect a HPA axis alterations. [35]. To develop cancer is a very traumatic experience for patients, facing the possibility of death, changes in the body image, fear of invasive treatments and pain, changes in their role in the family, in their work environment and in the society at large, all representing sources of acute stress. Stress is defined by stimuli (stressors), subjective reports of an experience, a general non-specific increase in arousal, and the feedback to the brain from this response.

Fortunately many types of cancer are becoming chronic conditions. But unfortunately humans, like other animals, are not prepared to deal with prolonged stressors. Those familiar with these patients know how their organizers are full of follow-up visits and check-ups for a long time. Talking with them you can learn how these individuals view their time. It is difficult to generalize depression in such context. In this prospective we could consider some manifestation of psychological suffering as a psychoneuroendocrinal alteration. In addition, the behavioural alterations that develop during illness are not just the result of a decreased ability to react to the external world and engage in physical activities. Pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by peripheral immune cells could function as a motivational signal that tells the brain to change the organism priorities in face of the threat represented by danger signals. This reorganization of priorities results in changes at the subjective, behavioural and physiological levels [36].

4. Biological correlates

There have been several studies of psychoneuroimmunological mechanisms and cancer. Biological alterations were investigated in relation to coping styles, psychological status, social support and survival. Most of these studies were conducted among patients affected by breast cancer, given that for this disease survival at five years is 88% [37].

Increasing evidence has suggested that circadian patterns of cortisol secretion are altered in cancer patients with advanced disease [3840]. Abercombie and colleagues showed that women with metastatic breast cancer had significantly flatter diurnal cortisol rhythms as compared with healthy controls [41]. Sephton found that flattened diurnal cortisol slopes were associated with decreased survival time among women with metastatic breast cancer [42], while Osborne's study found no evidence that cortisol and prolactin levels were associated with immune or psychosocial variables in breast cancer patients [43], similar results were obtained in a largest controlled study [44].

An important finding is that cortisol level in metastatic breast cancer is related to the quality of social support, belonging, appraisal, and tangible support [45].

Only one randomized controlled study showed that levels of omega-3 fatty acid are associated with minor (but not major) depression in lung cancer patients, unfortunately psychiatric diagnosis was made using HADS [46].

There are still inconsistent data regarding the association between mood disorders, NK cells, cytokines, cancer development and survival [4750]. In 116 breast cancer patients exposure to stress was associated with lower NK cell lysis and diminished responsiveness of NK to rIFN-γ [51]; while among men affected by prostate cancer optimism and less anger suppression was associated with greater natural killer cell cytotoxicity [52]. Consistently a structured group therapy in patients affected by malignant melanoma reduced distress and showed increases in NK cell cytotoxic activity as compared to controls [53]. Musselman first, reported that higher than normal plasma Il-6 levels were associated with a diagnosis of major depression in a small sample of cancer patients [54]. This finding was confirmed in a larger sample by Jehn et al., therefore the authors proposed the IL-6 increased plasma concentration as a biomarker of depression among cancer patients [55].

Costanzo et al. found that among 61 patients with advanced ovarian cancer social support play a protective role with respect to IL-6 elevations, and IL-6 may be an independent marker of health-related quality of life [56]. Raison and Miller reviewed the role of cytokines in cancer patients and suggested that inflammation provides a physiologic substrate that promotes mood disorders [57].

In spite of the increasing evidence that IL-6 and other pro-inflammatory cytokines may play a role in the pathophysiology of mood disorders and cause behavioural and neuroendocrine consequences, in cancer patients these phenomena are rather more complicated. In fact, different data regarding the relation between IL-6 and cancer are known. Consistent results have been shown that IL-6 is a pleiotropic regulator of prostate cancer cell growth, and serum IL-6 levels has prognostic significance in patients with metastatic prostate cancer [58, 59]. Moreover IL/6 induced basic fibroblast growth factor dependent angiogenesis in basal cell carcinoma [60]. In addition IL-6 may be involved in tumor-host interactions potentially favouring uveal melanoma growth, survival and proliferation [61]. Recently Berger reported that the gene encoding the IL6 is a susceptibility factor affecting racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival. [62]. All these data suggest that the general assertion regarding IL-6, depression and cancer needs great caution. Besides, it is well known that proinflammatory cytokines may cause depression or sickness behaviour and that psychiatric interventions affect levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. A randomized study on the efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in insomnia secondary to breast cancer provides evidence that treating insomnia can alter cytokine production [63]. In summary, apathy, social isolation, sleep disturbance, fatigue, anorexia, weight loss, cognitive disturbance, decreased libido and psychomotor retardation are symptoms of both Major Depression and cytokine-induced sickness syndrome, whereas guilt, depressed mood and suicidal ideation are more common in Major Depressive Disorder.

Neuroimaging correlates are emerging. Matsuoka demonstrated that cancer survivors with intrusive recollections had a significantly smaller total amygdala volume as compared with the total amygdala volume in cancer survivors without intrusive recollections [64]. In a case control study, Yoshikawa reported an alteration in amygdala volume associated with depressed mood after cancer diagnosis in 51 cancer survivors. [65]. Data obtained using PET in depressed cancer patients showed cerebral functional alterations similar to those founded among primary depressed patients [66, 67].

5. Depression as a risk factor in the prognosis of cancer

Data regarding the influence of psychological factors on the prognosis of cancer are available. Psychological status seems to predict the length of survival in several types of cancer such as melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, breast and kidney cancer. Longer follow-up indicate that a high fighting spirit confers no survival advantage, while in patients who were disease-free at 5 years, their baseline helpless/hopeless response still exerted a significant effect on disease-free survival beyond 5 (and up to 10) years. The effect is therefore maintained for up to 10 years of follow-up [68]. These results were usually obtained by validated instruments like the General Health Questionnaires, the Quality of Life Index or the Mental Adjustment to Cancer.

However there are few data regarding the unique role of mood in predicting survival. Results from 8-year follow-up study among 10.000 patients demonstrated that the coexistence of cancer and depression is associated with an increased risk of death [69].

Prieto, in the largest oncologic study that used standardized psychiatric criteria, found that among 199 hematologic cancer patients after stem-cell transplantation, Major Depressive Disorder predicted higher 1- and 3-year case-fatality-rate, and there was a trend for patients with minor depression to survive longer than patients with no depression [6]. Faller reported that in lung cancer patients emotional distress and depressive coping style predict short survival [70]. Recent studies found that high scores on a "minimizing the illness" scale predict longer survival [71, 72]. Although "minimizing the illness" coping style may have clinical utility, so far this construct has not been studied in relation to mood disorders. The impact of depression on mortality has not been definitively shown. Spiegel and Giese-Davis reviewed the link between depression and cancer progression, and suggested that there is not strong evidence supporting a link of depression with cancer incidence, though some methodological problems may have affected such results [73]. However untreated depressive disorders may be linked to faster progression.

The interpretation of these results is not univocal: depression may have a direct neuroimmune effect, or depressed patients may show poorer adherence to cancer treatment, or depression related behaviours affect several aspects of patients life such as health status, quality of life, parental role, working role. Results as those obtained by Fawzy on malignant melanoma in a 10-year follow-up study, suggest that a brief structured psychoeducational group intervention can moderately affect survival. [74].

Nevertheless, examining the effect on survival of psychotherapy, Palmer and Coyne correctly noticed that studies in which survival was not designated as a primary outcome cannot be given the same weight as studies designed with survival as an a priori end point [75].

6. Treatment

The single most important factor precluding treatment among depressed cancer patients is the misconception that for such patients being depressed is normal. Moreover most oncologists are unfamiliar with depressive disorders. Emerging data confute the notion that depression is inevitable and untreatable [76]. Therapeutic nihilism is not justified anymore. The evidence-based health care (screening and selective treatment) currently delivered to depressed cancer patients in selected oncology centres should be widespread. A range of options for service development should be outlined, rather than just one preferred method of service delivery. The training needs of staff must be fitted into the service model, as opposed to their training experience dictating the shape of the service, as it has happened in the past [77]. Unfortunately few data from clinical trials are available on the effectiveness of treatment for depression among cancer patients [78].

6.1 Pharmacological treatment

Fisch provided a brilliant review of the treatment of Depressive Disorders among cancer patients, in which he focused on the inadequate quality of research in this field [79]. At present there are only 10 randomized trials comparing antidepressants to placebo. An explanation, suggested by Fisch, is the relative aversion of patients and family members to the placebo controlled study design.

One could argue that the lack of Randomized Controlled Trials is the cause of under treatment of such disorders. There are also doubts about the physicians rigorous clinical evidence based prescriptions. Furthermore, as shown by Ashbury in lung cancer patients there is a weak correlation between detection of depressive disorders and treatment [16].

Another important issue is that of the heterogeneity of the outcomes, reflecting the same problems of assessment, and therefore data are difficult to compare. It should also be noted that there are several open or uncontrolled studies suggesting potentially improvements in depressed cancer patients. Probably, thank to the clinical experience with new antidepressants effectiveness, in the near future we could have more RCT data. In addition antidepressants have potential usefulness for the management of symptoms and conditions other than depression, such as hot flashes and pain [8083], so they are often prescribed to cancer patients [84, 85].

However, prescribing antidepressants to cancer patients requires specific knowledge, experience and caution. One must take into account: the anticholinergic side effects of tricyclic antidepressants, the pro-emetic effect of SSRIs and their potential effects on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs, and the specific syndromes occurring in combination with chemotherapy [86]. Medication should be tailored to each cancer patient based on the different characteristics of the various drugs [8789]. We do not agree with the recommendations that oncologists should prescribe antidepressant treatments, as other authors suggested. These decisions should be the responsibility of the consulting psychiatrist, because of his/her specific knowledge. Simply adding an antidepressant to other medications differs notably from a psychiatric prescription. One implication occurs with sleep disturbances, that often mirror a depressive disorder, while patients receive unsuitable medication such as benzodiazepines. Moreover, the patient's perception of being part of an active treatment is by far different from passively waiting for the medication effect.

6.2 Psychological treatment

Efficacy of psychological interventions in cancer depressed patients has been demonstrated, but effectiveness study are still lacking [90]. A systematic review of psychological interventions among cancer patients identified 129 trials that involved psychosocial outcomes [91]; only 24 studies showed an advantage for the intervention in terms of the endpoint of depression [79]. Previous reviews were more enthusiastic about the benefits of psychological interventions, but their approach was less conservative, particularly regarding the outcome measures for depression [92, 93]. It is difficult to compare the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions when the studies include several different techniques, procedures are not clearly spelled-out, or outcomes are different. Newell and colleagues proposed ten recommendations to improve the reporting of future randomized controlled trials of psychological therapies [91]. At present most interventions are cognitive behavioural oriented. Some authors recommend a cognitive approach to the treatment of depression among cancer patients, others reported that group therapy is more effective, although these indications should take into consideration the clinical variables of every single situation. It is known that in psychotherapy research there are several methodological difficulties, and this is even more true among cancer patients. Elements of fundamental relevance of the interventions are: brief structure and a clear intervention targeting. Despite these scientific issues, the main problem is that too often providers of psychological therapies are not adequately trained in psycho-oncology, or they have an inadequate contact with the oncology staff. It is important to notice that data regarding the effect of psychological interventions on biological parameters are available in the field of psycho-oncology more than in other fields.

7. Unmet needs of the cancer depressed patients

In oncology settings it is emerging the notion that cancer patients should not tolerate their depressive symptoms and the importance of appropriately informing them about it. Unfortunately many issues are still unresolved. The report from the Expert Working Group of the European association for Palliative Care has stressed the major unresolved problems regarding depression and cancer [90]. Among the several recommendations provided, there are the following ones: the need for specialized mental health professionals, and their different roles depending on local circumstances; the need of a close relationship between the oncology staff and the consultation-liaison psychiatry; the concept that antidepressants should be utilized without delay once the diagnosis of Major Depression has been established. It has also been suggested that staff training in detecting Depressive Disorders may not be a sufficient condition for a better management of depressive disorders. Besides, Passik and colleagues demonstrated that rarely oncologists recognize symptoms of depression, and depressed patients referred to a psychiatrist or a psychologist represent still a little percentage of total [94]. In addition, often differences in cultural perceptions of disease are underestimated. Psychological differences by background can make a major difference in the response of individuals to disease [17]. Also compliance varies for patients in the U.S., North Europe, or other countries, such as Italy.

As reported by Ell [8], in her study among the low-income, ethnic minority, only 12% of all the women affected by Major Depression were receiving medications, while among 10% of the middle-to upper income white women who met diagnostic criteria for major depression 80% were receiving antidepressants [7]. However the Multifaceted Oncology Depression Program Intervention, organized by Dwight-Johnson and colleagues, showed that depressive disorders can be successfully treated in a public sector oncology setting serving low-income patients. This model shows the importance of collaboration between several roles at different levels: community representatives, administrative and clinical committees [76].

Another underrated aspect is that not all patients want to have their depression recognised and treated [5, 79]. Various factors can explain this phenomenon, culture, patient's personality, prior experience with cancer, coping styles, gender differences. Fisch reported "that patients and their families know that a positive attitude or a "fighting spirit" is important to either the health outcome or the clinician willingness to treat the cancer aggressively, and this kind of belief can translate into a perceived risk in disclosing depressive symptoms" [79] This attitude could be related to the on-line information, more and more available without an adequate filter.

Recently it has been suggested that spirituality and spiritual coping are important to women with gynaecological cancer and that staff members should consider these issues [95]. Another important unmet need is the lack of links between psychiatric services and pain clinics; unfortunately, in many general hospitals, mental health teams have scarce resources and skill for managing patients with chronic pain. In addition it is well known that patients with depressive disorders have higher costs of general medical-care services compared with their non depressed peers. Treatment of depression may reduce these costs, in many ways including reduction of sickness-absence.

Institutions may provide new training programs as psychiatric subspecialties. Only in 2003 the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, trough the American Board of Medical Specialties, approved Psychosomatic Medicine as a psychiatric subspecialty. This could be due to the fact that in recent decades many diseases, including cancer, became chronic conditions, requiring more complex health care delivery.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, University "La Sapienza" of Rome
(2)
Dipartimento di Scienze Psichiatriche e Medicina Psicologica

References

  1. US Mortality Public Use Data Tape 2001, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003Google Scholar
  2. WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology. Cross-national comparisons of prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 2000, 78: 413-26.Google Scholar
  3. Üstün TB: The global Burden of mental health disorders. American Journal of Public Health. 1999, 89: 1315-1318.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Grassi L, Rosti G: Psychiatric and psychosocial concomitants of abnormal illness behaviour in patients with cancer. Psychother Psychosom. 1999, 65: 246-252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sharpe M, Strong V, Allen K, Rush R, Postma K, Tulloh A, Maguire P, House A, Ramirez A, Cull A: Major depression in outpatients attending a regional cancer centre: screening and unmet treatment needs. Br J Cancer. 2004, 90 (2): 314-20. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601578.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Prieto JM, Atala J, Blanch J, Carreras E, Rovira M, Cirera E, Espinal A, Gasto C: Role of Depression as a predictor of mortality among cancer patients after stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 6063-6071. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.751.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Coyne JC, Palmer SC, Shapiro PJ, Thompson R, De ichele A: Distress, psychiatric morbidity, and prescriptions for psychotropic medication in breast cancer waiting room sample. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004, 26: 121-128. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2003.08.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ell K, Sanchez K, Vourlekis B, Lee PJ, Dwight-Johnson M, Lagomasino I, Muderspach L, Russell C: Depression, correlates of depression, and receipt of depression care among low-income women with breast or gynecologic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 3052-3060. 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.041.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Okamura M, Yamawaki S, Akechi T, Taniguchi K, Uchitomi Y: Psychiatric disorders following breast cancer recurrence: prevalence, associated factors and relationship to quality of life. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2002, 35 (6): 302-309. 10.1093/jjco/hyi097.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgess C, Cornelius V, Love S, Graham J, Richards M, Ramirez A: Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five year observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005, 330: 702-707. 10.1136/bmj.38343.670868.D3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zabora J, Blanchard CG, Smith ED, et al: Prevalence of psychological distress among cancer patients across the disease continuum. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1997, 15: 73-87. 10.1300/J077V15N02_05.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kadan-Lottick NS, Vanderwerker LC, Block SD, Zhang B, Prigerson HG: Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer. 2005, 104 (12): 2872-81. 10.1002/cncr.21532.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML, Janssens AC, Schroder FH, de Koning HJ: Anxiety and depression after prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment: 5-year follow-up. Br J Cancer. 2006, 94 (8): 1093-8. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603057.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bardwell WA, Natarajan L, Dimsdale JE, Rock CL, Mortimer JE, Hollenbach K, Pierce JP: Objective cancer-related variables are not associated with depressive symptoms in women treated for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24 (16): 2420-7. 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.0081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Berard RMF: Depression and anxiety in oncology: The Psychiatrist's perspective. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001, 62 (8): 58-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ashbury FD, Madlensky L, Raich P, Thompson M, Whitney G, Hotz K, Kralj B, Edell WS: Antidepressant prescribing in community cancer care. Support Care Cancer. 2003, 11: 278-285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bailey RK, Geyen DJ, Scott-Gurnell K, Hipolito MMS, Bailey TA, Beal JM: Understanding and treating depression among cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005, 15: 203-208. 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.15204.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Derogatis LR, Melisaraatos N: The Brief Symptom inventory (BSI): An introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983, 13: 595-606.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983, 67: 361-70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Radloff LS: The CES-D: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977, 3: 385-401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Beck AT, Ward C: Reliability of psychiatric diagnoses. A study of clinical judgements and ratings. Am J Psychiatry. 1962, 19: 351-356.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 1994, Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 4Google Scholar
  23. Raison C, Miller A: Depression in cancer: new developments regarding diagnosis and treatment. Biol Psychiatry. 2003, 54: 283-294. 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00413-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller M, Sommerfeldt S, Fischer C, Knight L, Riesbeck M, Lowe B, Herfarth C, Lehnert T: Recognition of distress and psychiatric morbidity in cancer patients: a multi-method approach. Annals of Oncology. 2004, 15: 1243-1249. 10.1093/annonc/mdh318.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Costantini M, Musso M, Viterbori P, Bonci F, Del Mastro L, Garrone O, Venturini M, Morasso G: Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: validity of the Italian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Support Care Cancer. 1999, 7: 121-127. 10.1007/s005200050241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Biondi M, Picardi A, Pasquini M, Gaetano P, Pancheri P: Dimensional psychopathology of depression: detection of an "activation" dimension in unipolar depressed oupatients. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2005, 84: 133-139. 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00103-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pasquini M, Picardi A, Biondi M, Gaetano P, Morosini P: Relevance of Anger and Irritability in Outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder. Psychopathology. 2004, 37: 155-160. 10.1159/000079418.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Feinstein AR: An additional science for clinical medicine. The development of clinimetrics. Ann Intern Med. 1983, 99: 843-848.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fava GA, Ruini C, Rafanelli C: Psychometric Theory Is an Obstacle to the Progress of Clinical Research. Psychother Psychosom. 2004, 73: 145-148. 10.1159/000076451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Brennan J: Adjustment to cancer-coping or personal transition?. Psycho-Oncology. 2001, 10: 1-18. 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<1::AID-PON484>3.0.CO;2-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Servaes P, Verhagen C, Bleijenberg G: Fatigue in cancer patients and after treatment: Prevalence, correlates and interventions. Eur J Cancer. 2002, 38: 27-43. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00332-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Portenoy RK, Itri LM: Cancer-related fatigue: guidelines for evaluation and management. Oncologist. 1999, 4: 1-10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stone P, Richards M, A'Hern R, Hardy J: A study to investigate the prevalence, severity, and correlates of fatigue among patients with cancer in comparison with a control group of volunteers without cancer. Ann Oncol. 2000, 11: 561-567. 10.1023/A:1008331230608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Morrow GR, Hickok JT, Roscoe JA, Raubertas RF, Andrews PL, Flynn PJ, Hynes HE, Banerjee TK, Kirshner JJ, King DK, University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program: Differential effects of paroxetine on fatigue and depression: a randomized, double-blind trial from the University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21: 4635-41. 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bower JE, Ganz PA, Dickerson SS, Petersen L, Aziz N, Fahey JL: Diurnal cortisol rhythm and fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005, 30: 92-100. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.06.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dantzer R: Somatization: A psychoneuroimmune perspective. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005, 30: 947-952. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.03.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 1975–2000, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute. 2003Google Scholar
  38. Touitou Y, Levi F, Bogdan A, Benavides M, Bailleul F, Misset JL: Rhythm alteration in patients with metastatic breast cancer and poor prognostic factors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1995, 121: 181-188. 10.1007/BF01198101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Touitou Y, Bogdan A, Levi F, Benavides M, Auzeby A: Disruption of the circadian patterns of serum cortisol in breast and ovarian cancer patients: relationships with tumour marker antigens. Br J Cancer. 1996, 74: 248-1252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Porter LS, Mishel M, Neelon V, Belyea M, Pisano E, Soo MS: Cortisol levels and responses to mammography screening in breast cancer survivors: a pilot study. Psychosom Med. 2003, 65 (5): 842-848. 10.1097/01.PSY.0000088595.91705.C5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Abercrombie HC, Janine Giese-Davi J, Sephton S, Epel ES, Turner-Cobb JM, Spiegel D: Flattened cortisol rhythms in metastatic breast cancer patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004, 29: 1082-1092. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2003.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sephton S, Sapolsky R, Kraemer H, Spiegel D: Diurnal cortisol rhythm as a predictor of breast cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 994-1000. 10.1093/jnci/92.12.994.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Osborne RH, Sali A, Aaronson NK, Elsworth GR, Mdzewski B, Sinclair AJ: Immune function and adjustment style: do they predict survival in breast cancer?. Psycho-Oncology. 2004, 13: 199-210. 10.1002/pon.723.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vedhara K, Stra JT, Miles JN, Sanderman R, Ranchor AV: Psychosocial factors associated with indices of cortisol production in women with breast cancer and controls. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006, 31 (3): 299-311. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner-Cobb JM, Sephton SE, Koopman C, Blake-Mortimer J, Spiegel D: Social support and salivary cortisol in women with metastatic breast cancer. Psychosom Med. 2000, 2: 337-345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Kobayakawa M, Yamawaki S, Hamazaki K, Akechi T, Inagaki M, Uchitomi Y: Levels of omega-3 fatty acid in serum phospholipids and depression in patients with lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005, 93 (12): 1329-33. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602877.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Adler A, Stein JA, Ben-Efraim S: Immunocompetence, immunosuppression, and human breast cancer. III. Prognostic significance of initial level of immunocompetence in early and advanced disease. Cancer. 1980, 45: 2074-2083. 10.1002/1097-0142(19800415)45:8<2074::AID-CNCR2820450814>3.0.CO;2-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Levy SM, Herberman RB, Lippman M, D'Angelo T, Lee J: Immunological and psychosocial predictors of disease recurrence in patients with early stage breast cancer. Behav Med. 1991, 17: 67-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Reiche EM, Morimoto HK, Nunes SM: Stress and depression-induced immune dysfunction: implications for the development and progression of cancer. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005, 515-27. 10.1080/02646830500382102. 6Google Scholar
  50. Reiche EM, Nunes SO, Morimoto HK: Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2004, 5 (10): 617-625. 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01597-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Andersen BL, Farrar WB, Golden-Kreutz D, Kutz LA, MacCallum R, Courtney ME, Glaser R: Stress and immune response after surgical treatment for regional breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998, 90: 30-36. 10.1093/jnci/90.1.30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Penedo FJ, Dahn JR, Kinsinger D, Antoni MH, Molton I, Gonzalez JS, Fletcher MA, Roos B, Carver CS, Schneiderman N: Anger suppression mediates the relationship between optimism and natural killer cell cytotoxicity in men treated for localized prostate cancer. J Psychosom Res. 2006, 60 (4): 423-7. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.08.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Fawzy FI, Kemeny ME, Fawzy NW, Elashoff R, Morton D, Cousins N, Fahey JL: A structured psychiatric intervention for cancer patients, II: changes over time in immunological measures. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990, 47: 729-735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Musselman DL, Miller AH, Porter MR, Manatunga A, Gao F, Penna S, Pearce BD, Landry J, Glover S, McDaniel JS, Nemeroff CB: Higher than normal plasma interleukin-6 concentrations in cancer patients with depression: Preliminary findings. Am J Psychiatry. 2001, 158: 1252-1257. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.8.1252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Jehn CF, Kuehnhardt D, Bartholomae A, Pfeiffer S, Krebs M, Regierer AC, Schmid P, Possinger K, Flath BC: Biomarkers of depression in cancer patients. Cancer. 2006,Google Scholar
  56. Costanzo ES, Lutgendorf SK, Sood AK, Anderson B, Sorosky J, Lubaroff DM: Psychosocial factors and interleukin-6 among women with advanced ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2005, 15, 104 (2): 305-13. 10.1002/cncr.21147.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Raison CL, Miller AH: Depression in Cancer: New Developments Regarding Diagnosis and Treatment. Biol Psychiatry. 2003, 54: 283-294. 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00413-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Hammacher A, Thompson EW, Williams ED: Interleukin-6 is a potent inducer of S100P, which is up-regulated in androgen-refractory and metastatic prostate cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005, 37 (2): 442-50. 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.07.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. George DJ, Halabi S, Shepard TF, Sanford B, Vogelzang NJ, Small EJ, Kantoff PW: The prognostic significance of plasma interleukin-6 levels in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer: results from cancer and leukemia group B 9480. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (5): 1815-20. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Jee SH, Chu CY, Chiu HC, Huang YL, Tsai WL, Liao YH, Kuo ML: Interleukin-6 induced basic fibroblast growth factor-dependent angiogenesis in basal cell carcinoma cell line via JAK/STAT3 and PI3-kinase/Akt pathways. Invest Dermatol. 2004, 123 (6): 1169-75. 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23497.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Cools-Lartigue J, Marshall JC, Caissie AL, Saraiva VS, Burnier MN: Secretion of interleukin-6 and prostaglandin E2 during uveal melanoma-monocyte in vitro interactions. Exp Eye Res. 2004, 79 (4): 451-4. 10.1016/j.exer.2004.05.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Berger FG: The interleukin-6 gene: a susceptibility factor that may contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004, 88 (3): 281-5. 10.1007/s10549-004-0726-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Savard J, Simard S, Ivers H, Morin CM: Randomized study on the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia secondary to breast cancer, part I: Sleep and psychological effects. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 1;23 (25): 6083-96. 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.548.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Matsuoka Y, Yamawaki S, Inagaki M, Akechi T, Uchitomi Y: A Volumetric Study of Amygdala in Cancer Survivors with Intrusive Recollections. Biol Psychiatry. 2003, 54: 736-743. 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01907-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Yoshikawa E, Matsuoka Y, Yamasue H, Inagaki M, Nakano T, Akechi T, Kobayakawa M, Fujimori M, Nakaya N, Akizuki N, Imoto S, Murakami K, Kasai K, Uchitomi Y: Prefrontal cortex and amygdala volume in first minor or major depressive episode after cancer diagnosis. Biol Psychiatry. 2006, 59 (8): 707-12. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.08.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Inagaki M, Yoshikawa E, Kobayakawa M, Matsuoka Y, Sugawara Y, Nakano T, Akizuki N, Fujimori M, Akechi T, Kinoshita T, Furuse J, Murakami K, Uchitomi Y: Regional cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with secondary depressive episodes after fatal pancreatic cancer diagnosis. J Affect Disord. 2006, Sep 19Google Scholar
  67. Kumano H, Ida I, Oshima A, Takahashi K, Yuuki N, Amanuma M, Oriuchi N, Endo K, Matsuda H, Mikuni M: Brain metabolic changes associated with predispotion to onset of major depressive disorder and adjustment disorder in cancer patients. A preliminary PET study. J Psychiatr Res. 2006, May 8Google Scholar
  68. Watson M, Homewood J, Haviland J, Bliss JM: Influence of psychological response on breast cancer survival: 10-year follow-up of a population-based cohort. Eur J Cancer. 2005, 41 (12): 1710-4. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Onitilo AA, Nietert PJ, Egede LE: Effect of depression on all-cause mortality in adults with cancer and differential effects by cancer site. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006, 28 (5): 396-402. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.05.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Faller H, Bülzebruck H, Drings P, Lang H: Coping, distress and survival among patients with lung cancer. Arch Gen psychiatry. 1999, 56: 756-762. 10.1001/archpsyc.56.8.756.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Butow PN, Coates AS, Dunn SM: Psychosocial predictors of survival in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17: 2256-2263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Butow PN, Coates AS, Dunn SM: Psychosocial predictors of survival: metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2000, 11: 469-474. 10.1023/A:1008396330433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Spiegel D, Giese-Davis J: Depression and cancer: mechanisms and disease progression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003, 54: 269-282. 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00566-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Fawzy FI, Canada AL, Fawzy NW: Malignant melanoma: Effects of a brief, structured psychiatric intervention on survival and recurrence at 10-year follow-up. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003, 60: 100-103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Palmer SC, Coyne JC: Examining the Evidence that Psychotherapy Improves the Survival of Cancer Patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2004, 56: 61-64. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.02.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Dwight-Johnson M, Ell K, Lee PJ: Can collaborative care address the needs of low-income Latinas with comorbid depression and cancer? Results from a randomized pilot study. Psychosomatics. 2005, 46 (3): 224-32. 10.1176/appi.psy.46.3.224.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Peveler R, House A: Developing services in liaison psychiatry: making the case of need. Liaison Psychiatry. Planning Services for Specialist Settings. Edited by: Peveler R, Feldman E, Friedman T. 2000, Glasgow; Gaskell, 1-14.Google Scholar
  78. Williams S, Dale J: The effectiveness of treatment for depression/depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer. 94 (3): 372-90. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602949. 2006 Feb 13Google Scholar
  79. Fisch M: Treatment of Depression in Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs. 2004, 32: 105-111. 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Loprinzi CL, Pisansky TM, Fonseca R, Sloan JA, Zahasky KM, Quella SK, Novotny PJ, Rummans TA, Dumesic DA, Perez EA: Pilot evaluation of venlafaxine hydrochloride for the therapy of hot flashes in cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 1998, 16 (7): 2377-2381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Tasmut T, Hartel B, Kalso E: Venlafaxine in neuropathic pain following treatment of breast cancer. Eur J Pain. 2002, 6: 17-24. 10.1053/eujp.2001.0266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Kimmick GG, Lovato J, McQuellon R, Robinson E, Muss HB: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of sertraline (Zoloft) for the treatment of hot flashes in women with early stage breast cancer taking tamoxifen. Breast J. 2006, 12 (2): 114-22. 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00218.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Durand JP, Brezault C, Goldwasser F: Protection against oxaliplatin acute neurosensory toxicity by venlafaxine. Anticancer Drugs. 2003, 14 (6): 423-425. 10.1097/00001813-200307000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Razavi D, Allilaire J, Smith M, Salimpour A, Verra M, Desclaux B, Saltel P, Piollet I, Gauvain-Piquard A, Trichard C, Cordier B, Fresco R, Guillibert E, Sechter D, Orth JP, Bouhassira M, Mesters P, Blin P: The effect of fluoxetine on anxiety and depression symptoms in cancer patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996, 94: 205-210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Theobald DE, Kirsh KL, Holtsclaw E, Donaghy K, Passik SD: An Open-Label, Crossover Trial of Mirtazapine (15 and 30 mg) in Cancer Patients with Pain and Other Distressing Symptoms. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002, 23 (5): 442-7. 10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00381-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Richards S, Umbreit JN, Fanucchi MP, Giblin J, Khuri F: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced rhabdomyolysis associated with irinotecan. South Med Journal. 2003, 96 (10): 1031-3. 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000084311.35864.D6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Thompson DS: Mirtazapine for the treatment of depression and nausea in breast and gynecological oncology. Psychosomatics. 2000, 41 (4): 356-9. 10.1176/appi.psy.41.4.356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Davis MP, Khawam E, Pozuelo L, Lagman R: Management of symptoms associated with advanced cancer: olanzapine and mirtazapine a World Health Organization project. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2002, 2 (4): 365-376. 10.1586/14737140.2.4.365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Pasquini M, Biondi M, Costantini A, Cairoli F, Ferrarese G, Picardi A, Sternberg C: Detection and treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders among cancer patients: feasibility and preliminary findings from a liaison service in an Oncology Division'. Depression and Anxiety. 2006, 16: 1-8.Google Scholar
  90. Stiefel F, Die Trill M, Berney A, Nunez Olatre JM, Razavi D: Depression in palliative care: a pragmatic report from the Expert working Group of The European Association for Palliative Care. Support Care Cancer. 2001, 9: 477-488. 10.1007/s005200100244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Newell SA, Sanson-Fisher RW, Savolainen NJ: Systematic review of psychological therapies for cancer patients: overview and recommendations for the future. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94: 558-584.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Sheard T, Maguire P: The effect of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in cancer patients results of two meta-analyses. British Journal of Cancer. 1999, 80 (11): 1770-1780. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690596.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Meyer TJ, Mark MM: Effect of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Health Psychology. 1995, 14 (2): 101-108. 10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Passik SD, Dugan W, McDonald MV, Rosenfeld B, Theobald DE, Egerton S: Oncologist's recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998, 16: 1594-1600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Boscaglia N, Clarke DM, Jobling TW, Quinn MA: The contribution of spirituality and spiritual coping to anxiety and depression in women with a recent diagnosis of gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005, 15 (5): 755-61. 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00248.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pasquini and Biondi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.