Open Access

Add-on quetiapine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage

  • Mauro Giovanni Carta1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Fausta Zairo1,
  • Gisa Mellino1 and
  • Maria Carolina Hardoy1, 2, 3
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health20073:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-28

Received: 09 September 2007

Accepted: 26 November 2007

Published: 26 November 2007

Abstract

Background

Depressive episodes in elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage are characterized by poor responses to standard antidepressants. Recent reports have suggested that the atypical antipsychotic, quetiapine may have antidepressant properties and, in mice, may prevents memory impairment and hippocampus neurodegeneration induced by global cerebral ischemia.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy with quetiapine in depressed elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage.

Methods

An open-label, 6-month follow-up study of patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV) and cerebral abnormalities (assessed by MRI) without severe cognitive impairment. Patients who had not responded to standard antidepressants (months of treatment 6.5 ± 7.2) additionally received quetiapine (300 ± 111 mg/d). Patients were evaluated at baseline (t0) and Months 1, 3, and 6 (t1, t3, t6) using the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Severity (CGI-S) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D).

Results

Nine patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 72.8 ± 9.4 years. CGI-S scores decreased from baseline to Month 6: 5.8 ± 0.7 (t0), 5.4 ± 0.7 (t1), 5.0 ± 0.8 (t3), and 4.5 ± 1.0 (t6), with a significant improvement at 6 months compared with baseline (P = 0.006). A significant improvement over the 6-month period was also observed with HAM-D scores (t0 = 27.2 ± 4.0, t6 = 14.8 ± 3.8, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

In this study, quetiapine was efficacious as combination therapy in depressed elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage. The promising results from this study warrant confirmation in large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Introduction

A serious and common risk to the elderly is depression, which, if untreated, is associated with a high rate of relapse, an increased likelihood of chronicity, and an elevated rate of mortality [1]. Affective disorders (such as depression) and vascular disease (including heart disease) are frequently comorbid conditions that share certain etiopathogenetic and prognostic factors. If untreated, depressive episodes may worsen the course of vascular disease (particularly cerebrovascular diseases) and compromise both quality of life and lifespan expectation. The close correlation between these comorbidities recently led to the identification of so-called "vascular depression" (Figure 1) [2].
Figure 1

Clinical characteristics of vascular depression.

Depressive episodes in elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage are characterized by low response rates to antidepressants, and it has therefore become increasingly important to investigate new treatments [3]. However, few therapeutic choices have been validated by strong clinical evidence.

Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and episodes of mania associated with bipolar disorder. A lot of studies have also described quetiapine monotherapy to be effective and well tolerated in unipolar [4] and bipolar depression [5]. Recently was reported that quetiapine prevents memory impairment and hippocampus neurodegeneration induced by global cerebral ischemia in mice [6] and pre-administration of quetiapine significantly alleviated the depressive and anxiolytic-like behavioural changes induced by global general ischemia in mice [7]. Authors say that these results suggest a wider perspective for the clinical use of quetiapine.

Nevertheless the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) advises there may be an increased risk of mortality (mainly due to cardiovascular or infectious causes) in elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with atypical antipsychotics.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of quetiapine as add-on therapy in elderly patients with late-onset depression and cerebrovascular damage.

Methods

Study design

An open-label study of depressed elderly patients resistant to ongoing treatments with cerebrovascular damage who were observed for up to 6 months during add-on treatment with quetiapine.

Study population

Elderly patients (>65 years of age), with a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (DSM-IV) [8] and cerebrovascular damage documented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] score <25) [9].

Absence of psychotic symptoms or evident psychomotor agitation.

No response to commonly prescribed antidepressants (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D] score >18) [10] following at least 3 months of treatment.

Written consent for the study was obtained after giving patients a complete description of the study.

Study medication

Quetiapine was administered as add-on therapy with commonly prescribed antidepressants (paroxetine, citalopram, sertraline, mirtazapine).

Quetiapine therapy was initiated at a minimum daily dose of 25 mg/d on Day 1 and was titrated up to 200 mg/d on Day 7 according to the schedule shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Titration schedule

Day

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Quetiapine dose (mg/d)

25

25

50

75

100

150

200

After Day 7, the dosage was increased by 100 mg every 2 days until the optimal dose, based on individual response and tolerability, was reached.

Efficacy assessments

Efficacy was evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S) [11] and HAM-D rating scale [10].

Patients were assessed at baseline (t0), and at the 1-month (t1), 3-month (t3), and 6-month (t6) follow-up visits.

Statistical methods

Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to test for differences in mean CGI-S and HAM-D scores over time.

Results

Patient and treatment characteristics

Nine patients (6 females, 3 males) who had not responded to standard antidepressants (mean [± SD] 6.5 ± 7.2 months of treatment) were included in the study.

Patients had a mean age of 72.8 ± 6.4 years, a mean baseline CGI-S score of 5.8 ± 0.7, and a mean baseline HAM-D score of 27.2 ± 4.0.

Antidepressants administered in combination with quetiapine are shown in Table 2. Other relevant medications taken were benzodiazepines (6 patients) and gabapentin (1 patient).
Table 2

Antidepressants used in combination with quetiapine*

Antidepressant

Number of Patients

Paroxetine

3

Citalopram

3

Sertraline

1

Mirtazapine

2

*Some patients received more than one of the listed medications

The mean quetiapine dose (SD) during the study was 300 ± 111 mg/day.

Efficacy

During the period of add-on quetiapine treatment, CGI-S scores improved significantly from a mean baseline (t0) score of 5.8 ± 0.7 to 4.5 ± 1.0 at 6 months (t6) (F = 10.21, P = 0.006; Table 3, Figure 2).
Figure 2

Mean CGI-S scores in elderly patients with depressive episodes and cerebrovascular damage during add-on quetiapine therapy.

Table 3

Mean CGI-S scores during add-on quetiapine treatment

Evaluation time

Mean score (SD)

Baseline (t0)

5.8 (0.7)

1 month (t1)

5.4 (0.7)

3 months (t3)

5.0 (0.8)

6 months (t6)

4.5 (1.0)

Reductions in mean HAM-D scores from baseline to Month 6 were also statistically significant: t0 = 27.2 ± 4.0, t6 = 14.8 ± 3.8, (F = 34.4, P < 0.001).

Tolerability

No patients discontinued the study.

Side effects reported by patients during the period of add-on quetiapine treatment were sedation (2 patients) and drowsiness (1 patient).

Discussion and conclusion

Add-on quetiapine therapy significantly improved depressive symptoms and was well tolerated in these elderly patients with comorbid depression and cerebrovascular damage who had previously failed to respond to standard antidepressants.

Although limited by its open-label design and small sample size, this study demonstrates the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in this elderly patient population and is consistent with our previous findings [12] and other positive studies of quetiapine in Bipolar Depression [5], Major Depressive Disorder [4] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder [13].

The results of a survey in mice suggest that quetiapine may have defending effects on the impairments induced by cerebral ischemia [6]. Another study shows that quetiapine significantly attenuates bilateral common carotid artery occlusion induced spatial memory impairment and this improvement parallels the alleviative effects of quetiapine on bilateral common carotid artery occlusion induced neurodegeneration in the hilus of hippocampus [7]. Quetiapine may have a neuroprotective and neurogenetic role and this may be related to the therapeutic effects of quetiapine on cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia and depression, in which the structure and functions of the hippocampus are implicated [6, 7]. The neuroprotective effect of quetiapine was recently confirmed in humans with bipolar disorders [14].

Quetiapine (with clozapine and risperidone) is the drug most commonly used for treat behavioural problems of dementia patients and do not seem to cause severe side effects according to published data, thus may have a possible role in vascular depression [1517].

These results require confirmation from large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health, University of Cagliari
(2)
University Center for Research and Clinical Practice in Mental Health, University of Cagliari
(3)
ASL 7 Iglesias

References

  1. Anderson DN: Treating depression in old age: the reasons to be positive. Age Ageing. 2001, 30: 13-17. 10.1093/ageing/30.1.13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexopoulos GS, Meyers BS, Young RC, Kakuma T, Silbersweig D, Charlson M: Clinically defined vascular depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1997, 154: 562-565.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Simpson S, Baldwin RC, Jackson A, Burns AS: Is subcortical disease associated with a poor response to antidepressants? Neurological, neuropsychological and neuroradiological findings in late-life depression. Psychol Med. 1998, 28: 1015-1026. 10.1017/S003329179800693X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McIntyre A, Gendron A, McIntyre A: Quetiapine reduces residual depressive and prominent anxiety symptoms in partial responders to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) with major depression: an 8-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. European Psychiatry. 2006, 21 (Suppl 1): S164-Google Scholar
  5. Calabrese JR, Keck PE, Macfadden W, Minkwitz M, Ketter TA, Weisler RH, Cutler AJ, McCoy R, Wilson E, Mullen J: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar I or II depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2005, 162: 1351-1360. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yan B, Bi X, He J, Zhang Y, Thakur S, Xu H, Gendron A, Kong J, Li XM: Quetiapine attenuates spatial memory impairment and hippocampal neurodegeneration induced by bilateral common carotid artery occlusion in mice. Life Sci. 2007, 81 (5): 353-61. 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.05.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yan B, He J, Xu H, Zhang Y, Bi X, Thakur S, Gendron A, Kong J, Li XM: Quetiapine attenuates the depressive and anxiolytic-like behavioural changes induced by global cerebral ischemia in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2007, 182 (1): 36-41. 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.05.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical manual for Mental Disorders. Fourth Edition (DSM IV). 1994, Washington DC; American Psychiatric PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Mini-mental state, a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Pschiat Res. 1975, 12: 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton M: A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 1960, 23: 56-62.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Guy W: Clinical Global Impression. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, revised. 1976, Rockville MD: US Department of Health Education and Welfare, 217-222.Google Scholar
  12. Hardoy MC, Garofalo A, Carpiniello B, Calabrese JR, Carta MG: Combination quetiapine therapy in the long-term treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder. Clin Pract Epidemol Ment Health. 2005, 1: 7-10.1186/1745-0179-1-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Brawman-Mintzer O: Quetiapine monotherapy in patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Anxiety Disorders Association of America (ADAA). 2006Google Scholar
  14. Atmaca M, Yildirim H, Ozdemir H, Ogur E, Tezcan E: Hippocampal 1H MRS in patients with bipolar disorder taking valproate versus valproate plus quetiapine. Psychol Med. 2007, 37 (1): 121-9. 10.1017/S0033291706008968.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rainer M, Haushofer M, Pfolz H, Struhal C, Wick W: Quetiapine versus risperidone in elderly patients with behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: Efficacy, safety and cognitive function. Eur Psychiatry. 2007, 3:Google Scholar
  16. Yury CA, Fisher JE: Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of behavioural problems in persons with dementia. Psychother Psychosom. 2007, 76 (4): 213-218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Poewe W: Treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease dementia. Mov Disord. 2005, 20 (Suppl 12): S77-82. 10.1002/mds.20544.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Carta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement